111

Ship packed with explosive Russian fertiliser floating off Kent (www.telegraph.co.uk)

submitted 14 hours ago by solidgrue@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A cargo ship with links to Russia packed with explosive fertiliser is floating off the Kent coast after being denied entry at other ports over safety fears.

Ruby, a Maltese-flagged cargo ship carrying 20,000 tonnes of ammonium nitrate fertiliser from a port in Russia, was ordered out of Tromso in Norway and turned away from Danish waters.

More alleged shenanigans with this craft drifting around the North Sea, ostensibly enroute to the Canaries.

top 25 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 3 hours ago

Ammonium nitrate isn't dangerous.

It's not gunpowder, it's not rocket propellant, it's not liquified natural gas

you need extreme heat and fuel to make it detonate, in the Beirut case that was given by nearby stored fireworks, but otherwise it's pretty safe to use, you can blast it with a blowtorch and it doesn't even burn

The misconception of it being explosive comes from the fact that people buy it as fertilizer and then use it to make bombs by mixing it with fuel and other primary and secondary explosives (or just to have some fun with homemade gunpowder), and even then, usually you use potassium nitrate, a derivative of ammonium nitrate, because the ammonium nitrate is just so goddamn hard to detonate

Now, should they accept the ship? I don't know, as far as I know Russia's regulations might as well allow storage of ammonium nitrate inside the ship's fuel tanks, but some simple checks would mitigate 99.99999% of risks.

That said, it's still Russia and we shouldn't be giving it money anyways, but I'm not gonna get into politics here

[-] fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc 6 points 2 hours ago

I think it's just a bullshit article trying to manufacture drama, as though Russia sent this bomb or something.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

you need extreme heat and fuel to make it detonate

Wouldn't lightning be extreme heat? The North Sea is very stormy.

[-] isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 27 minutes ago)

The rain would quickly render it useless as an explosive, and if it was inside a container the metal would shield it

and even then, ammonium nitrate is just an oxidiser, (in layman's terms, it makes already flammable stuff burn faster when ignited, so fast that in some cases it detonates), and without fuel it can't do anything on it's own

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Surely our Russian friends only ever had the best and most honest intentions with this.

[-] barkdoor@infosec.pub 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

So if it went up, it would flood London, take out a chunk of North Sea wind power and dent the electric and telecoms cables connecting the UK to continental Europe. Maybe Gravelines reactors also

[-] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago

As a wise (and drunk) man once said:
"KE-BLEWWWEY!!" -demoman tf2

[-] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 13 hours ago

“This is a ship that nobody wants, but that nobody can get rid of.”

20,000 tonnes of ammonium nitrate

i see something resembling a solution, right there

[-] SmoothOperator@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

The Danish media reported that it has the explosive potential of a first generation nuke.

[-] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 hours ago

if that was mixed with fuel, sure (15kt) but on its own should be a bit less (6.5kt)

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago

Pretty sure this is the same shit that blew up in the Beirut port. I wouldn't let a Russian ship full of that shit into my port.

https://youtube.com/shorts/wqKn_3iJOP4?si=MHbGhm3dVjzyUeDJ

[-] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 9 points 4 hours ago

It's not shit, it's an artificial shit substitute

[-] Assman@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

Soylent explosives

[-] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 7 hours ago

Remember the Beirut explosion? Yeah, that

[-] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Remember the Beirut explosion?
Now realize that it was caused by around 1/10th as much ammonium nitrate that is on this ship (2750 vs 20000 tonnes)

[-] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 hours ago

yeah, you really don't want that ship anywhere near people or infrastructure

[-] Fermion@feddit.nl 20 points 12 hours ago

Blowing up beached whales disperses the problem, but does not solve it.

[-] alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 hours ago

In Russia, even the fertiliser kills you.

[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 19 points 13 hours ago

It's a thing they do, bit mafia-esque, they sail a mostly un-seaworthy hulk full of oil, minerals, heavy metals, in this case fertilizer, off the coast of a picturesque port of yours, and say "here's your order, you better pay to pick it up!".

Either you wait for the ship to go aground and destroy the local environment, or you buy the stuff, offload it, and pay them to tow the ship "outside of the environment".

It's their way of forcing sales and trying to break their way back into markets in a fairly threatening way.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 25 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

It's not intentional. They screwed up the ship and nobody wants a damaged ship full of enormous amounts of explosive material in their port.

The ship has been seeking a port for it to dock in as it is in need of repairs, having cracked its hull after previously running aground.

Jens Wenzel Kristoffersen, a defence analyst at Nordic Defense Analysis and a former naval officer, questioned why the ship had not been ordered to return to Russia.

He said that its condition and cargo posed an environmental and health risk.

“One can question whether it is at all justifiable for the ship to be allowed to sail. There are several reasons for this,” he told Danish media. “It has cracks in the hull. It has rudder problems. It can no longer sail by itself, but must be towed.”

He added: “This is a ship that nobody wants, but that nobody can get rid of.”

That ship in Beiruit had similar issues -- it wasn't seaworthy, so wasn't allowed to leave, because it wasn't seaworthy, and the owners just abandoned it in port, where (a) all the ammonium nitrate was offloaded and the port authority in Beiruit had to deal with it and (b) the sunken hull.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MV_Rhosus

MV Rhosus was a general cargo ship that was abandoned in Beirut, Lebanon, after the ship was declared unseaworthy and the charterers lost interest in the cargo. The 2,750 tonnes of ammonium nitrate which the ship was carrying was confiscated and brought to shore in 2014, and later contributed to the catastrophic 2020 Beirut explosion. The vessel's owner at the time of abandonment was Cyprus-based Russian businessman Igor Grechushkin. The ship sank in the Port of Beirut in 2018.

The ship is still blocking Beirut port space.

I think that a likely better concern is less that the thing is going to just blow up after reaching port -- though I did read an earlier article pointing out that if repairs require welding, that it's a risk -- and more that it might wind up abandoned in port like the other ship.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I’m sure Ukraine could find a use. Maybe we tow it to a port of their choosing?

Where’s the Black Sea fleet hiding again?

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world -3 points 9 hours ago

Just tie it up right next to a diesel oil freighter and let it bask in the London Thames for a bit.

[-] JustCopyingOthers@lemmy.ml 5 points 12 hours ago

Which part of Kent? I hope it's not hanging around the wreck of the SS Richard Montgomery!

[-] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

K-k-k-kent! It's c-c-c-coming to k-k-k-kill you!

this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024

111 points (96.6% liked)

World News

38627 readers

2770 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Recommendations

How to spot Misinformation and Propaganda

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

little_cow@lemmy.world

quinten@lemmy.world

NewsAutoMod@lemmy.world

jordanlund@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

lemmyAtom@lemmy.world

FlyingSquid@lemmy.world