59
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by treasure@feddit.org to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

EDIT: Original post seems to have been removed, try this Nitter mirror instead.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Onihikage@beehaw.org 4 points 3 days ago

Tweet not found, not even when I change the URL to go directly to Twitter. Was it deleted?

[-] thesmokingman@programming.dev 4 points 3 days ago

The Twitter account has been privated and there are no news stories about it. Other communities where this has been shared are reasonably suspicious.

[-] MrSoup@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I found this talking about the tweet. Nothing more.

[-] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

While a CVSS score of 9.9 indicates critical severity, it’s important to approach the situation with a balanced perspective.

The whole article sounds like somebody asked chatGPT to explain the tweet in more detail.

[-] MrSoup@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yes, it is indeed derived from the tweet either made by an LLM or by some low effort human. But still a good "mirror" of the deleted tweet.

[-] thesmokingman@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago

Nice! That second one is just a repost of your first.

I wonder where the sources for this are? The hidden Margaritelli Twitter post?

Canonical and Red Hat have not only confirmed the vulnerability’s high severity but are also actively working on assessing its impact and developing patches.

[-] MrSoup@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

A critical security vulnerability [...] has been identified by renowned security researcher Simone Margaritelli.

Yep, it's linking to that post.

[-] treasure@feddit.org 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Copying my reply from another thread:

This link should be working.

Quoting from the OP tweet:

* Unauthenticated RCE vs all GNU/Linux systems (plus others) disclosed 3 weeks ago.
* Full disclosure happening in less than 2 weeks (as agreed with devs).
* Still no CVE assigned (there should be at least 3, possibly 4, ideally 6).
* Still no working fix.
* Canonical, RedHat and others have confirmed the severity, a 9.9, check screenshot.
* Devs are still arguing about whether or not some of the issues have a security impact.

I've spent the last 3 weeks of my sabbatical working full time on this research, reporting, coordination and so on with the sole purpose of helping and pretty much only got patronized because the devs just can't accept that their code is crap - responsible disclosure: no more.

[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 2 points 3 days ago

oh it's the same guy who makes OpenSnitch and such? Unfortunately in that case it's most likely legit

[-] refalo@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago

I tried OpenSnitch but it would always randomly crash while interacting with the GUI, and it would reset all my tcp connections every time you start it back up.

[-] saddlebag@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

No comments in 6 hours and the post has been deleted

this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
59 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

31355 readers
1455 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS