111
submitted 1 month ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Canada's government on Monday announced it is imposing a 100% tariff on imports of Chinese-made electric vehicles that matches U.S. tariffs and follows similar plans announced by the European Commission.

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Zannsolo@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago

I mean it probably a horrible idea to have a bunch of cars running Chinese software in our country. Their prices are artificially low because of terrible labor standards. But we need to do something to bring the price of EVs down.

[-] realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club 12 points 1 month ago

Don't we already have EV subsidies? Are those going away or something?

[-] macaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago

The subsides are for getting an industry off the ground before it becomes competitive against traditional technology. EVs aren’t there yet because of inherent limitations to how our metropolitan areas are organized. Hybrids seem to be the best bet, until there’s a high voltage (1kv?) charger that doesn’t destroy the battery. Otherwise, society should investigate alternative fuel distribution.

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

Don't we already have pretty strict safety standards for vehicles? I can't imagine these Chinese vehicles meet all the safety and testing requirements for the price they're sold for.

[-] Zannsolo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I'm thinking more of espionage.

[-] dan1101@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago

I would buy a cheap Chinese EV. I'm not paying $45,000 for one.

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

What auto industry is Canada protecting? I doubt they think China is subsidizing their EVs to half the cost otherwise.

[-] FireTower@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I imagine there's probably a good amount of subcontracting w/ American ones.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

I would assume they do believe the cars are subsidized or otherwise unfairly priced. But I wouldn't rule out pressure from US diplomacy encouraged by donations from the American auto industry.

[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

You should rule out donations, Canada's federal donation rules are pretty strict.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago
[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm not so sure about that. Federal donation rules are pretty strict. Now, in the provinces and the states this is a totally different story.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

Associated Press - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Associated Press:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

CNBC - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for CNBC:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://apnews.com/article/china-eu-evs-tariffs-801965213d23e8a67452ed6a4a560d49
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/26/canada-imposes-a-100percent-tariff-on-imports-of-chinese-made-electric-vehicles.html
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
111 points (94.4% liked)

News

22939 readers
5689 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS