486
Single-Page Application
(lemmy.ml)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
486 points (94.2% liked)
Programmer Humor
32124 readers
1724 users here now
Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)
Rules:
- Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
- No NSFW content.
- Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
> implying there's a "right way" to build an SPA.
There are a lot of standard practices like… using a router to load the content of your SPA according to the url.
What I'm saying is, there's no right way to build a thing that is inherently wrong.
You could build it with no input sanitation. That’s wrong.
Even a perfectly-built SPA is a thing that should've been a different kind of program (a native app or even something like Java Web Start) instead.
I strongly disagree, but I respect your opinion which was no doubt formed by different experiences with web technologies than I’ve had.
Not that it’s inherently good or bad, but the heavier web apps get the more a browser represents a sort of virtualization environment that only runs one stack. I think that’s interesting.
What do you mean only runs one stack? Like front end framework? That would be the point. But it can communicate with any backend.
There's no one right way. Saying there are wrong ways doesn't imply the existence of one right way, though.