72
EU politicians pass vote on controversial Nature Restoration Law
(www.irishtimes.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
72 points (100.0% liked)
Europe
8324 readers
3 users here now
News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺
(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures
Rules
(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)
- Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
- No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
- No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.
Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
What makes it controversial? How the land is aquired?
People who just care about their monthly income are not interested in the future of humanity. Of course, that's a simplification because various farmers, land-owners, companies and industries, and old right-wing people all have their own problems with it, which generally involves: My Money vs the Future of Humanity
The politics. Pros and contras etc. Interests of politicians, industry, Farmers, constituents, food &housing etc. The article has a good list of pro & contra . pro law
contra law
Ed: I don't think it will be illegally acquired. In the Netherlands the Gvment is proposing a forced sale. Doesn't make it a free choice though.