373
submitted 11 months ago by DevCat@lemmy.world to c/usa@lemmy.ml

A North Carolina teenager was hoping to get her life back on track after a state judge ordered a man who sexually abused her to pay her $69,000. Instead, she got a nasty surprise.

The local police department had already seized the cash through civil asset forfeiture, and it was already gone. Despite a judge's order, she will get nothing.

The case is a stunning example of the misplaced priorities and perverse incentives that asset forfeiture creates for police—and of how the federal government allows state and local police to evade reforms to stop forfeiture abuse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] fubo@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

Those who receive stolen property may be required to return it to the person it was stolen from.

this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
373 points (99.7% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7145 readers
300 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS