this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
739 points (98.7% liked)

News

25357 readers
5654 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tree_frog@lemm.ee 188 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (8 children)

I'm not sure if the article covers it, still reading, but one of the things they want to do to disenfranchise transfoks is to require the the name on your birth certificate matches you're legal name in order to vote.

As most married women don't change their name on their birth certificate when they take their husbands last name, they would not be able to vote either.

Edit: The article does go into all of this.

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

In British Columbia, there is no legal requirement to change your last name after marriage, and either spouse can legally use either last name at their leisure without any bureaucratic change. It is a genderless law.

Fuckin A, now I am really appreciating that.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 hours ago

My wife and I were talking about this last night. She chose not to change her name when we got married, as she's been down that road before and has no desire to do it again. I'm totally fine with it, she's been able to grow and discover things about herself now that she "wasn't allowed to" in her past marriage, and I love helping her realize that. We also just got our passports the other day - work wants me to get mine and paid for it, so she got hers as well.

[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 36 points 13 hours ago (10 children)

Holy. Fucking. Shit. That’s bad. That’s oppressively stupid fucking bad.

Hey Americans: Don’t want to be oppressed or live in a fascist state? Immigrate to Canada! We’re hella friendly and open to people’s of all kinds, except MAGAs and Nazis and or maga-nazis

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 14 points 12 hours ago

I mean, y'all gonna let me in? I need a place to crash for at least 4 years.

[–] ArtemisimetrA@lemmy.duck.cafe 13 points 12 hours ago (2 children)
[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Hmm. You all raise a good point. As Canadians, I think we need to make it easier for Americans to immigrate here.

We need to experience and expertise and we need to learn how to expedite that to bring the right people here to help expand Canadas capabilities.

Canadians, how to we make this happen? I have zero knowledge how to make this happen.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 10 hours ago

You guys seem to have a very open asylum policy. Give it a few years and a lot of Americans might qualify without you doing anything else.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 hours ago

For real I'm not even allowed in that country for a crime I committed 20 years ago.

[–] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 10 points 12 hours ago

I would move up there next week if it was that easy and didn't mean probably losing my awesome job. Oh, and it might be a bit disruptive for my family, too.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I’m still happy with Massachusetts, but my company is based in UK and we have an office outside Toronto. The road is paved

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 3 points 10 hours ago

Toronto is the one city that everything else being even I think I might like to live more than where I am at.

[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I'm moving to Sweden but I'll be stopping by your way first! I'm too trans to let tsa look at my passport so I'm going to land travel to you all and take a plane out from there

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

Unless things have changed significantly at the border in the past few years, there's no process to leave the US. It's just the Canadian border guard checking things as you enter their country.

Of course, if the GOP decides to fully enact Operation: Handmaid's Tale, then that could change.

[–] QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works 9 points 12 hours ago

I was going to say, “no, stay and fight”, but on second thought I agree with this sentiment for more vulnerable groups like trans folks

[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 hours ago

Ha, if only that was an actual possibility. Most Americans will not qualify for immigration to Western countries.

I'd also hold off on thinking you'll be safe. Poilievre might be unpopular now, but there's a lot of time between now and the election. It's not a slam dunk for Liberal, fascism can absolutely still rise in your country too.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Give us places to stay, welcome us, and offer us work and we'll gladly come

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Eh...

We're not a consolation prize, they've let shit get fucked in their country for decades.

[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 hours ago

Yeah. You’re absolutely right, but there’s still a ton of good Americans that Canada could utilize to help us build our industry that we need.

We need more than just exploited real estate in this country, and I’m sure a ton of Americans could help us make that happen at an accelerated level.

I’d much prefer to take in Americans that are disenfranchised with their country, than have a disenfranchised country try and turn us into a new Guam.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Besides a province or two.

[–] Banana@sh.itjust.works 68 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Interesting thing about that is that, while it's still common practice, a lot of more left-leaning women did away with taking their husband's name years ago

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 44 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah my wife and I just kept our name. Its funny because over the years we sorta wish we would have done the traditional thing as it would make a variety of things easier but now apparently its becoming a brilliant move.

[–] raoulduke85@lemm.ee 14 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

My wife did the same, but for unofficial stuff, she uses my last name as hers.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 16 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

yeah its more problematic for official stuff really. like being in the hospital. Its not much but like you tend to have to make it more clear your the spouse.

[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

ID with the same address usually solves this for me.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 2 points 6 hours ago

a little conversation usually does but sometimes, if she is conscious, they have to verify with her and it can take a bit if they are to busy.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

We got married ten years ago and she didn't take my name. I'm very much cool with it, and it's got easier over the years.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

yeah it was a slow burn annoyance and she gets annoyed by it more than I but it took like 20 odd years to be like. This is sorta annoying. EDITED - hey so im rethinking and it started at about the 10 year mark and built up over time but as I said its little things. My wife has a lot of medical issues though so we might have more nuisance around it than the typical couple.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 hours ago

We all got our struggles. Ours are shitty and I'm sure you guys have shitty ones too. Fucking life is shitty. All we can do is try to help our people out when we can.

[–] tree_frog@lemm.ee 26 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Left leaning women are also far less likely to get married to begin with.

The article actually points all of that out, it will be Republican women who mostly are disenfranchised by this.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 10 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

In a sort of twisted way that could result in a blue wave if they disenfranchised ~half of their own voters and not the left.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 19 points 12 hours ago

They’ll presumably remedy this by giving husbands extra votes on behalf of their wives and children, as in Franco-era Spain.

[–] raoulduke85@lemm.ee 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

My wife didn’t take my last name and I’m so glad.

[–] Banana@sh.itjust.works 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

My mom never took my dad's so I grew up with that being the norm, so I took it step further and my partner and I are not even married despite being together 11 years.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah my partner and I didn't get married until 8 years deep, and that's going steady. We were fucking on and off for years before. We did it to appease our family. Never had any kids thank the hole in the ozone.

[–] Banana@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago

Tbqh i don't know if we are ever gonna get married, just because it's not the main priority, but I do make sure he's my beneficiary for most things.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Long term, this seems like an effective way to end that custom. What person would go into marriage changing their name when they know this attitude is at play?

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 hours ago

It's cute you think that's not another right they'll quickly take away from women as soon as they can.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 12 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

so anyone who changes their name? So like a whole bunch of hollywood. two birds one stone I guess from their view.

[–] tree_frog@lemm.ee 13 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

If it's a legal name change. But I assume a lot of Hollywood names aren't legally changed, but more similar to a pen name.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 8 points 13 hours ago

I hate pasting this url but it talks about actors who did and the first one was because of a requirment for the actor to have the same stage and legal name so don't understand that but it was david tennant so maybe something with international that complicated it. https://www.buzzfeed.com/kristenharris1/celebrities-changed-legal-names-stage-names

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It depends on how much paperwork you do when you change your names, how much autocracy you want to fight

When my ex divorced me she warned me me she wasn’t going through that again so I just need to deal with her keeping my name. She kept half of everything else of mine so I guess it’s no difference

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 2 points 10 hours ago

Well that was the thing. If we did it off the bat it was like a checkbox, but to do it later is a larger nuissance than the nuissance of them being different.

[–] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 5 points 12 hours ago

Yep, that's in there:

House Republicans passed a bill (which stalled in the Senate) this session to require citizens to have a passport or birth certificate matching their name to vote.

[–] ChadMcTruth@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

i had some ideas about this that i shared recently https://lemmy.world/post/25499276