this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
147 points (98.0% liked)

Canada

8067 readers
1186 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

AMID US president Donald Trump’s tariffs and annexation threats, Sigmar Gabriel, former German vice chancellor and foreign minister, made a curious suggestion in an interview with German media outlet The Pioneer: invite Canada into the European Union. Soon after, Guy Verhofstadt, former prime minister of Belgium, addressed Canada on X to say that “[t]here is no reason why EU membership should be off the table.” The thought of this North Atlantic alliance excited some Canadians and Europeans—one YouTube video even theorized how “CANEU” (read: canoe) would be a “global superpower.”

To learn more about what the possibilities are for Canada and the EU, I spoke with Mark Camilleri, president and CEO of the Canada EU Trade and Investment Association—CEUTIA—based in Brussels.

"In terms of trade, what similarities do Canada and the EU share?"

There’s a lot of complementarities when you go across sectors. Take mining, for example. Canada has an abundance of natural resources that the EU doesn’t have, but Europe creates and makes a lot of industrial equipment that helps extract those resources. Europe has a certain need for these resources as part of their own economic security.

If you take a look at the fertilizer that Canada produces, Europe needs it to support their agricultural sector. Another example is nuclear energy. Nuclear is going through a renaissance at the moment, and Canada can basically cover the full supply chain from mining uranium to building nuclear reactors.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thisorthatorwhatever@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Canada should nationalize the railroads.

Nationalize all mines, and mining.

We should build a nation car, a basic 4-cycliner car with AWD capabilities, plug-in-hybrd, regenerative braking, easy to repair with parts always available. Make all the software code and hardware schematics free. Have it as one of our military vehicles for basic transport, make it so that all cab companies have to use it, all Uber drivers, delivery drivers, that's the only car municipalities get to buy for staff, only car Provinces get to buy for staff.

[–] Franklin@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

can we nationalize our internet service providers while we're at it

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

See, now there's an actual good idea. That shit's like the road system.

You have to pay the current shareholders for it all, though, unless you think Canada can go it totally alone and hated.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

We should build a nation car, a basic 4-cycliner car with AWD capabilities, plug-in-hybrd, regenerative braking, easy to repair with parts always available

That last one is pretty difficult to square with the rest.

Have it as one of our military vehicles for basic transport, make it so that all cab companies have to use it, all Uber drivers, delivery drivers, that’s the only car municipalities get to buy for staff, only car Provinces get to buy for staff.

Is it wheelchair accessible too? If so, how much weight and cost does that add? One could keep going.

This is why economics by political proclamation either turns into 700-page documents or fails dramatically.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

Problem with the vehicle is that certain government departments need something other than a sedan.

[–] Krik@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

What problem(s) does this nationalization and the 'people's car' solve?

Too much of the economy is based around the auto industry, too many social and environmental issues are based around everything structured around cars.

i. Governments throw lots of money toward the car industry, tax cuts for the factories, subsidized wages for the workers.
ii. Owing a car is now becoming more expensive, and you need a new one every 15 years as they don't last long. iii.Car speeds and horse power have now crept up to crazy levels. Beyond any reason of what people need. iv. Car companies are not focused on what people want, safety, instead they keep putting more horse power into cars. v. Massive environmental costs in terms of pollution and sprawl. vi. Oil companies are killing the planet and causing wars.

Almost everything when we talk of the 'real' economy, we mean car factories and oil wells.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nationalization would improve services. The people's car solves fuck all, and would be a maintenance nightmare.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

How is it a maintenance nightmare?

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 1 points 1 day ago

Economic resilience, removes foreign control from our key resource companies, creates jobs in country to remove American jobs we'll be losing enmasse