Firefox

18068 readers

9 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

k_o_t@lemmy.ml

489

Mozilla to expand focus on advertising - "We know that not everyone in our community will embrace our entrance into this market" (blog.mozilla.org)

submitted 2 months ago by golden_zealot@lemmy.ml to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

231 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Can one thing please not be full of adverts :( I'll pay for the browser, I just want marketers to fuck off for a while lol

[–] abbenm@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Did I miss something? I don't think the browser is going to be full of ads?

[–] tux0r@feddit.org 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Mozilla actually has (had?) ads in Firefox, right on its default start page.

[–] abbenm@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Right and that has existed long before today. And I can't find anything in this article suggesting that the start page, or anywhere else, is going to be reallocated towards new ads which is what it sounds like the commenter above me was suggesting.

[–] Furball@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You can easily turn them off in settings

[–] tux0r@feddit.org 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Opt-out can never be the right answer.

[–] dan@upvote.au 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Would you prefer Mozilla to not exist? They're trying to find revenue streams other than the money they get from Google.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

I would prefer Mozilla to ask. Some options:

on first install, pick your poison - donate, accept ads, or accept negative karma
pay to remove ads on a page - you'd pay into a bucket, and payments to remove ads would subtract from that
more optional, revenue-generating services (e.g. push their VPN harder)

[–] tux0r@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The current incarnation of Mozilla would not be any meaningful loss to me.

[–] Furball@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well it would to everyone who relies on Mozilla for making the only current alternative engine to chromium. Mozilla dying would harm its forks, too, and finally give chromium a total monopoly

[–] tux0r@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago

Other engines exist.

[–] rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Not that they've announced yet, I just meant more broadly I am very sick of advertising and adverts

[–] AGuyAcrossTheInternet@fedia.io 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Realistically, I don't think so either. Pessimistically, I give it until Jan 1st, 2030.

[–] AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago

Your pessimism is more optimistic than my optimism