this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
610 points (97.1% liked)

Firefox

18068 readers
9 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 76 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

You mean like isolating cookies?

Like integration state partitioning for the entire browser context, user-controllable?

Like adding vertical tabs?

Like background wallpaper options for new tab independent of themes?

Like site translations?

Like working on tab groups?

Like working on tablet UI options?

Like .. okay I'll stop.

Like with red traffic lights vs green traffic lights, always keep in mind that your brain does not want to actively notice/recall things going well. It's when things are annoying/interrupting that you remember.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 3 months ago

No, not like that! JUST LET ME BE HATEFUL FFS

[–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Vertical tabs? I've been using an extension for that so I didn't even notice. Is that already on the main release or still on the nightlies?

Sorry for asking here but a DDG search just turns out a bunch of pages telling you how to get them with extensions, which I already do.

[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Its still experimental, (in nightly), and a bit unpolished so id stick with the extensions for now

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I use it but…keeps waiting for jxl

I’m jealous of Safari users

[–] KLISHDFSDF@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Any sites out there even serving JXL? With a "global usage" of 13%, I don't see many developers wasting their time on it unless there's some niche use case that requires it.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

Hard to use without browser support

[–] golden_zealot@lemmy.ml -2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

All I intend to say is that if I left when Mozilla thought it was a good idea to have an advertising company become involved in the development of their products and started tracking users without their consent (even if less invasively than cookies) with PPA, then surely I am not the only one who left.

This is a company that has previously sideloaded an extension into the browser without user permissions because of a marketing deal they made with a television show. As a result, I'm afraid im less concerned with the not-yet implemented features they may be working on or the features they have in place when there are a litany of other browsers available which don't fuck around with user permissions and privacy for advertising deals.

If I wanted a browser for tab grouping and UI stuff, I'd move to vivaldi, but at the moment firefox just doesn't seem to have the best UI or the best security and both of those are directly related to Mozilla's choices.

You are certainly entitled to your opinion and it is valid, but I think that my criticisms are also valid and are not baseless.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh for sure criticism is valid, but it's funny how people always forget all the actual good stuff being added, too.

In general, not just Firefox-specific. People constantly forget how while Google search results have gone to shit, empyrical analysis showed that it went to shit more for other search engines (meaning if anything Google got comparatively better, but of course everyone got worse across the board, too). People constantly forget over all their little issues how some countries, including mine, have swapped >50% of their energy (from ~0%) to green energy in just 10 or so years. It's too easy to see only the negative things.

[–] golden_zealot@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

Yes, it's true that some good things have been added, I suppose my concern is just that I feel the negative things in the case of firefox hold greater weights when compared to the positive things they have done.

As a euphemism; a cruise ship adding a bowling alley, better seating, and fine art to its interior is neat and might make it look better and more convenient but it doesn't mean much to me if they also added an engine which spews 50% more pollution into the atmosphere and poisons me.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works -2 points 3 months ago

Like adding vertical tabs?

Having fucked an entire ecosystem of UI-modifying plugins, seven years prior. Still not matching the functionality of that decades-running, userbase-driven experimentation. I want my goddamn multi-row tabs back.

Mozilla doesn't get kudos for tiny improvements as if they cancel out huge blunders. Killing vertical tabs by killing XUL also severely limited DownThemAll, and they spent a year ignoring pleas from the guy that gave their browser and their browser alone the best download plugin to-date. He eventually managed to "just rewrite!" and claw most functionality back from Chrome's tightassed tool-kit. Most authors did not. Most authors had not, since the browser fucking launched. I can barely remember how much functionality I've lost, thanks to Mozilla refusing to respect plugin devs and formalize any lasting API. The best bits did come back, thanks to other authors who also missed those features... until they too burned out and fucked off.

But hey! Mozilla also made some clever tweaks inside the only software project that advertises their true passion for smartphones I mean chat I mean crypto I mean AI I mean $nextbigtrend, so it's squaresies.