26
submitted 1 day ago by Linkerbaan@lemmy.world to c/usa@lemmy.ml

NEW YORK - Columbia University announced on Monday the revision of its anti-discriminatory guidelines, introducing new policies explicitly addressing the use of terms like "Zionist" when employed to target Jews or Israelis, in an effort to combat antisemitism and provide clearer criteria regarding harassment. The 73-page document prohibits coded language and includes a detailed checklist for students filing complaints.

Columbia's actions emulate those of other universities, such as NYU, which announced last month that anti-Zionist discrimination may violate its student conduct rules.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee -3 points 1 day ago

There is a two-way misinformation issue right now that really complicates things. If you legitimately criticize Zionism, the pro-Israel side accuses you of antisemitism, which is bullshit. However, actual antisemites are using the word "Zionist" as a proxy term for "Jew", and exploiting he current climate against Israel to spread classical antisemitic narratives. The result is a mix of honest "Zionism motivates human rights abuse against Palestinians" statements, and dishonest "Zionists control the world" statements.

When Jews and their allies attempt to counter antisemitism masquerading as anti-Zionism, their legitimate criticisms are treated like pro-Israel gaslighting. One of the most egregious examples of this happened in Seattle, where the Wing Luke Museum hosted a "Confronting Hate Together" exhibit featuring contributions from different ethnic communities in the city.

They kicked the Jewish group out because they said "Today, antisemitism is often disguised as anti-Zionism,” and said “pro-Palestinian groups have voiced support for Hamas” (both issues that affect the non-Zionist Jewish community, and that I have personally witnessed).

Worse yet, the museum defended their decision saying that the Jewish group conflated anti-Zionism with antisemitism and excluded Palestinian, Arab and Muslim perspectives. The thing is, they didn't say all anti-Zionism was antisemitism, they said that antisemitism can be disguised as anti-Zionism. That's true. And why would the Jewish group be obligated to include Arab and Muslim perspectives? Why are they required to answer for this conflict in this way just for being Jewish? Were there no Arab and Muslim groups invited to participate in this exhibit?

The Jewish group did their own exhibit somewhere else (so much for confronting hate together), and the Wing Luke Museum director resigned.

If folks would actually learn what Zionism is and criticize it with clarity, this kind of thing wouldn't be an issue. Increasingly, the people using "Zionist" as a pejorative are just using it as a blanket term for "Jews I disagree with", and that is really fucking shitty.

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 3 points 23 hours ago

and said “pro-Palestinian groups have voiced support for Hamas” (both issues that affect the non-Zionist Jewish community, and that I have personally witnessed).

Please explain how supporting Palestinian resistance negatively effects nonzionist Jewish folks.

[-] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee -2 points 21 hours ago

Easy. Hamas isn't the resistance.

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 3 points 21 hours ago
  1. they are the majority of the forces in the United front which includes everything from communists to conservatives

  2. that didn't answer my question at all. I will rephrase for your benefit:

Please explain how supporting Hamas(and other Palestinian resistance) negatively effects nonzionist Jewish folks.

load more comments (8 replies)
this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
26 points (90.6% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7142 readers
573 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS